The House That Paxlovid Built

My dears, Pfizer’s first quarter reads like the memoir of an ageing baron who, though past his gallant duels, still commands a formidable estate. Revenues fell 8%—a retreat largely traced to Paxlovid’s diminished returns now that the pandemic has ceased its starring role. But do not mistake contraction for collapse. Beneath the surface, one sees a firm tightening its corset, realigning costs and redistributing its wealth from old battles to future campaigns.

Adjusted EPS rose a crisp 12% to $0.92. Vyndaqel, Lorbrena, and even Comirnaty staged a revival. Xeljanz and Ibrance, alas, were not so lucky—bludgeoned by Medicare reforms and generics nipping at their heels. Still, Pfizer’s $4.5 billion cost-cutting scheme—augmented by an additional $1.2 billion in expected savings—signals not desperation but discipline. The capital is not squandered; it is being diverted prudently into the R&D stables, where fresh fillies like Padcev and Abrysvo await the track.

I shall watch closely whether these horses gallop or stumble, but for now, Pfizer remains a sound holding—an aristocrat in transition, downsizing the manor but preserving the land. And that, as any good banker knows, is where the true value lies.

Granny’s Verdict:Despite shrinking Paxlovid sales, Pfizer's pipeline pulses with promise and prudent cost controls—one applauds such restraint.

Even the wisest financial strategies are not immune to the whims of the market. While I may sound rather confident (as well I should), I am not a fortune teller, nor is the stock market a vending machine dispensing guaranteed riches.

If you choose to invest, do so with awareness—markets rise and fall, and even the soundest investments carry risk. If you put your entire life savings into meme stocks, well… that’s hardly my fault now, is it?

In short: Be prudent, be patient, and for heaven’s sake, don’t bet the rent money.
💰 Advice